this was the way he always thought the end of the world would feel," according to the post. He hated to be alone in his thoughts with the feeling of uncertainty he'd been trying to avoid for weeks. The post was designed to describe Peiper's thoughts, according to Payne. The story of the Battle of the Bulge will run multiple times each day over the course of the next 6 weeks." This was in no way intended to glorify the German forces, but to fully portray the odds stacked up against the Americans by December 19th. "In an attempt to tell the full story of the fight, we also presented the perspective of the German commanders involved in the counterattack. The Facebook post containing his image (and others) was the first in a series telling the full story of the Battle of the Bulge," Rainsford wrote. "We regret the use of the photograph of Joachim Peiper. Tage Rainsford, spokesman for the XVIII Airborne, released the following statement. The post was part of a planned campaign of posts on the Battle of the Bulge that's scheduled to run from Dec. "The concept of yesterday's post was to introduce the bad guy or the thoughts of a bad guy on the 16th of December," Payne told. Allie Payne, a spokeswoman for the XVIII Airborne Corps. The post, however, was not a mistake, according to Maj. "I'm certain it was poor judgment and an inadequate approval process. "Poor judgment for sure," Fickel tweeted. Fickel is currently a student at the Army War College.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |